bicycling, mobility, technology, Transportation

Finding the best cycle commute in LA

Living in LA is a hoot. It’s even better if you experience as many neighbourhoods as you can. During our second year of living car free, we decided to live in new places to get a better flavour – Highland Park, DTLA, South Pasadena, Hollywood Hills (seriously), Santa Monica, Atwater Village. Yes, hipsters, but fun. In many cases we tried to live near decent transit, but I also took the opportunity to try and use my bike more to commute to work in DTLA.

Cycle commuting is something I’ve shied away from so far, although I do quite a bit of bike riding in my spare time mainly in the mountains, where the traffic is thin and the views are spectacular. Cycling in heavy traffic and pollution really didn’t float my boat.


Riding Mulholland Drive. A commute route for some, but for me it’s a Sunday buzz. 


LA has an ambitious ‘Vision Zero‘ – zero traffic deaths by 2025. Considering that 44% of all deaths and severe injuries in LA involve people walking or bicycling, it has got a lot of work to do. Even crossing the road here in LA is a high risk prospect. Luckily, with the influence of advocacy groups such as the Los Angeles Bicycle Coalition, things seem to be on the move, with a new protected bike lane appearing in Downtown alongside a brand new bikeshare system launched by Metro. In Hollywood there is now a ‘scramble crossing’ that makes it easier for pedestrians to get where they want to go (i.e. in a straight line).


The new scramble crossing in Hollywood. Part of LA’s Vision Zero to obliterate traffic deaths by 2025

While we wait for a safer city, there are a number of technologies, such as smart trip planners and mapping that can help with recommend bike routes. They will get you away from the badness and give you as pleasant route as possible and connect you, where possible, with physical infrastructure on the ground.

Google Maps worked with Metro to integrate their cycle network data, which means better routing  results for cyclists. I also purchased a handlebar mount for my smartphone which meant I could use GPS to make sure I was on the right path. Strava, the activity logging app, also released a nifty ‘Beacon’ feature which allows your ‘safety contacts’ (i.e. my wife) to track my journey and see where I am. Really handy for a commute.

A cyclist also needs really good lights  so I have a Blaze ‘laserlight’ that not only puts out a bright flashing beam, but also projects a green image of a bike onto the lane in front of me. This light was developed with cyclist safety in mind and it really works, especially at intersections and junctions. It’s also a great conversation starter with other commuters!


The Blaze laser light in action.


So far, South Pasadena wins the prize as the best connected by bike. About 2/3 of the 8.5 mile route I took into DTLA used some form of dedicated cycling infrastructure, apart from one section that connects Lincoln Heights to Chinatown that can get a little dicey, but then you are back on the cycle lane on Spring that takes you to Pershing Square. The journey took me around 30mins (granted I’m a seasoned cyclist) which was quicker than getting to the Gold Line and transferring to the Red Line. I got to use the cycle path that runs along the Arroyo Seco. It’s fast, safe and allows you to miss out some really busy roads. Granted, there are quicker routes, but the extra distance was a trade off for safety and a more pleasant ride.

Did I feel safe on my commute to DTLA? Kind of, but with caveats. I’d been cycling in LA enough to work out what to be aware of at intersections (people blindly turning right or left across my path). You need eagle eyes. But, I used to really look forward to my commute. Where the City had provided decent cycle lanes I felt that I was somewhat in control, but couldn’t help but feel that they were missing a trick with leaving out any form of infrastructure on S Main. It’s absolutely crying out for it – and where you put this type of infrastructure you will get more cyclists. They just need to fill the gaps to give riders more confidence. Without it, they will struggle.


California does have some empty roads! Onyx Peak – Southern California’s highest paved road. 

After our adventure, we  moved back to Los Feliz, on the north-east side of the City. LF has great connections to Griffith Park, one of LA’s more popular cycling destinations, and also to the LA River Bike Path that connects the north end of the Park with, well, the lovely 5/110 flyover. It doesn’t really go anywhere useful yet which is a massive shame, plus the Army Corps of Civil Engineers have closed the path between 7am and 4pm – drastically reducing the options available to bike commuters.


Santa Monica bike path. Create for biking, and slinging your hammock!


For a commuter you’ve got a number of choices, most of them so-so. You can hit the River Path to avoid traffic completely but are then confronted with what happens when it runs out (you have to do the Main St rat run as described above). This route doesn’t come up in Google Maps, but I know it well enough. You can also take the bike lane on Sunset, which is the obvious choice as it’s pretty direct, but when the schools are back this route can be horrific at rush hour (pollution, noise, traffic). You also have to run the risk of getting doored by drivers not looking where they should. Then there’s the mess of DTLA to deal with. You have to be prepared and ready for anything. It’s not particularly relaxing but is a smidge quicker than transit at around 24mins door to door. There are other options, but to be honest I don’t trust the ‘bicycle friendly’ nature of a road with no cycle lane.


Where I ride my bike. The redder the road, the more times I’ve ridden it. Most are cycle paths or car-free roads in Griffith Park or along the LA River Path. 

Here’s hoping that Measure M will bring further change in LA, especially for cyclist and pedestrian safety.



mobility, shared use, technology

Live/Ride/Share – LA’s first Shared-Use Mobility Summit


Hi all. On Monday I’ll be attending Live/Ride/Share – a conference that will be focusing on shared-use mobility in Southern California. Shared-mobility is a catch-all term for transport modes that can be shared amongst citizens – think Uber (ride-sourcing), bikeshare, carshare (such as zipcar) and carpooling. With the increased uptake in smartphone technologies, open data and a desire to reduce the cost of driving, shared-mobility is an exciting way forward for LA. It looks like the day will provide insight into how shared-mobility could mean lower car ownership and provide viable options for the tricky ‘first mile, last mile’ element of a journey. Excited.

Looks like the conference is sold out – which is awesome!

I’ll report back on how it went, and if you’re going, please be sure to say hi!

mobility, technology, Transportation

LA ranked fourth amongst US cities where technology can reduce the need to own a car

Morning all. I was sent a link to a new report that considers how technology has provided new transport tools and options – the Innovative Transport Index. Los Angeles has come in at fourth on the list, below Austin, San Francisco and Washington DC. It tied with Boston and New York City. I think this is very positive for LA, although one would expect the larger cities to have more options. Interestingly, three other cities where I work – Seattle, Denver and San Diego – all made the top ten. These cities are offering viable options to their citizens, predominantly via the use of technology – smart phone apps, real time information, dynamically-driven websites, bike share and ride-sourcing systems. Simply put, these technologies provide people with options for their daily trips – often using real time information to provide the answer to the question – ‘what’s the best option for me right now?’. The photo below show’s Washington DC’s bike share system – perhaps not a viable option during freezing temperatures, but a ‘smart’ app could provide alternatives based on cost, mode preference or time of day.


Looking back on my previous post, perhaps it would be interesting to see how these cities are dealing with accessibility, and if these technologies have had an impact on the visually and mobility impaired? Should that be included as part of the index? Should car usage and ownership also be taken into account?

Let’s see if we can’t get LA higher up the index.